Let’s say the cost of a compliance program costs $12,000 annually. Does that sound pricey?
It’s all about what you are replacing.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology system, $12,000 might be money well spent. If a small business with seven employees could manually gather the same evidence in the space of a few hours every month, the cost is quite different.
It’s a smart way to start the look for Vanta. Don’t begin by asking which one has the greatest features. Ask your business how these features will help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with an Break-Even Point
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. The benefits of compliance automation changes as the company grows. Imagine a company in the field of technology which is expanding, numerous cloud environments, numerous applications, and constant changes to access. The effort of manually capturing evidence on a regular basis could be very heavy. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence could easily justify the cost.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 people who are preparing to go through the first SOC 2. audit. It may have a relatively smaller infrastructure, and the collection of evidence could be managed without extensive automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. Although an advanced platform might have a lot of features however, they’re only useful for organizations that are required by the company.
Compare Architecture not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to examine the services, features and contracts offered by both platforms. Both are reputable platform for compliance, which focuses on integrations and automation.
You’ll have to decide on something else first. Do you want to use a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain businesses would prefer automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Some companies prefer to supply evidence on their own, particularly in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the Same Model
Many Vanta competitors are also in the same class that focuses on automation. There are also more lightweight platforms that focus on the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance specialists. It combines framework controls into a single work space and gives editable guidance on policies and evidence. Auditors can review the evidence submitted through a read-only interface.
It is not able to connect to operating systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own proof.
The System Access consideration in the Making
The removal of integrations does not come without its downsides. Someone has to manually collect evidence.
The application for compliance doesn’t require any integration and can be used without having to establish connection to the operating environment.
Both architectures aren’t universally superior. It is essential to inquire which choices are best to your business.
CertAssist is targeted at companies that comprise between five and 200 people and provides pricing information rather than having to have the sales pitch. The starting price is $225 monthly, which is comparable to the usual price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
The requirements of a 10 person start-up today might not necessarily match its needs at 100 or 500 employees.
It is possible to maintain compliance with a a simple platform. As systems, employees, frameworks, and requirements for evidence grow, the economics will eventually favor greater automation. It is better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its place.
Paying for fifty integrations just because they look great in a comparison table is not worth it. They should be paid for only if the cost of doing the job they replace manually is higher.