Suppose a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. What is the cost?
The replacement it makes will determine the answer.
Automating the gathering of evidence in a complicated technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of repetitive work then $12,000 could be a well-spent amount of money. If a company of seven could gather the same data by hand in just a few hours every month, the total appears to be quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking which platform offers the most features. Find out what features help your business save time and work.
The Break-Even Point of Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t always beneficial or harmful. Its value changes with scale. Imagine a technology firm that is growing, and has numerous cloud environments, many applications, and constant changes to access. The burden of manually collecting evidence constantly could be extremely heavy. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can quickly justify their cost.
Think about a company with 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. Its infrastructure might be small, and evidence collection could remain manageable without the need for extensive automation.
This is an important distinction to consider in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. The capabilities of an advanced platform are amazing, however they are only useful when a company requires them.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a comparison that can easily become a feature-by feature exercise. It is important to compare the features, services and contracts offered by each platform. Both are reputable systems for compliance that are focused on automation and integrations.
You’ll need to make a decision on an additional thing before you do. Do you think your business is ready for an integrated compliance platform in any way? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Others would rather provide evidence by themselves, especially when the volume of work is low.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same pattern.
A lot of Vanta competitors are in the same class that focuses on automation. There are lighter platforms that focus on organization over an extensive network of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance experts. It organizes the framework controls into a single workspace that offers editable guidelines on policies and evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence through a restricted interface.
It doesn’t intend to connect to operational systems nor create infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the proof they wish to present.
System Access is a consideration in the Decision
The detachment of integrations has its limitations: one must manually gather evidence.
This is a way to eliminate the need for integration and the application of compliance does not require an integration with the operating environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. Which tradeoff is right for your business?
CertAssist targets teams of five to 200 employees and offers pricing information rather than having to have an actual sales call. The starting price is $225 per month, which is a significant reduction from the standard price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
Today’s needs for a startup that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily identical to those of the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
It is possible to maintain compliance with a a simple platform. As employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence increase, the financials could eventually favor deeper automation. Allow complexity to take the lead when purchasing compliance technology.
Affording fifty integrations because they look good in a table of comparisons isn’t worth the cost. You should pay for them only when the cost of doing the work manually is more expensive.